Nearly 1,000 audit and assurance interns have been trained in judgement, fraud detection and critical thinking as the firm prepares for the automation of core junior tasks
The ability and authority to challenge GenAI output is the crux of the systemic flaw I have been researching. This is different to automation bias; there a person is over-relying on the output because other pressures prevent proper analysis. You are describing exactly what I have called Judgement Displacement.
I like the idea of role-playing for juniors to learn what they need. (You could have GenAI design the training to incorporate the most important, useful, and common tasks. :)
A large multi-national corporate I visited recently have begun training their interns as leaders of virtual teams: several GenAI members are given complementary roles — fundamentally checking each other's work — while the human is responsible for the oversight and final product.
Thank you for this — particularly for naming the distinction so clearly. And I also really like the virtual-team model you observed. Positioning the intern as the leader of a small GenAI “team” whose members are deliberately given complementary (and therefore cross-checking) roles is a clever way of forcing the human to stay in the oversight seat.
The ability and authority to challenge GenAI output is the crux of the systemic flaw I have been researching. This is different to automation bias; there a person is over-relying on the output because other pressures prevent proper analysis. You are describing exactly what I have called Judgement Displacement.
I like the idea of role-playing for juniors to learn what they need. (You could have GenAI design the training to incorporate the most important, useful, and common tasks. :)
A large multi-national corporate I visited recently have begun training their interns as leaders of virtual teams: several GenAI members are given complementary roles — fundamentally checking each other's work — while the human is responsible for the oversight and final product.
Thank you for this — particularly for naming the distinction so clearly. And I also really like the virtual-team model you observed. Positioning the intern as the leader of a small GenAI “team” whose members are deliberately given complementary (and therefore cross-checking) roles is a clever way of forcing the human to stay in the oversight seat.